Shipping Markets: Where are the VL's going?

Dear Readers,

I'm sure you've all read the interesting rumours regarding VLBCs (and/or Chinamaxes) and VLCCs. What puts these behemoths in the "Top News" sections is that the sheer volume of cargo they carry and the economies of scale that they allow, can do nothing other than cause a shift in the market. So let's put these rumours to rest and see what the facts say:

Tankers:

With 102 VLCCs available for the next 30 days in the Arabian Gulf, I think it is safe to say that it is a bit overcrowded. In the AG - Far East route, VLCCs were making around $31,000/day more 2 weeks ago, and now they can make around $17,000/day more in the West Africa - U.S. route, than what they are making today. This explains why at least 5 vessels have made their way to West Africa, in ballast conditions no less, and upon hearing a WS77.5 on that route, other owners are also considering it a viable option. This action will no doubt push the West Africa market, while tightening the Arabian Gulf one, hopefully balancing out the oversupply issues that exist.

Bulk Carriers:

Capesizes are the ones that usually lead the market, since the volume they carry has a big impact on commodities. But this looks like it's changing, leaving a big question mark as to whether or not the Capesize vessels will survive. Akis Tsirigakis of Nasdaq-listed Star Bulk Carriers has put in an order for Capes, 2 of which will be delivered next year. He believes that economies of scale will move people to order larger vessels. On that note, Vale is expecting their first of 30 VLBCs (around 400,000dwt) in 2011. Even their competitor Rio Tinto has gone that route, and they want to make a "Brazil - China Highway" for Iron Ore (to begin with). Their argument is that these are expected to cost around $20/ton freight, whereas Capes cost close to $29/ton. This makes one wonder if the Capes will be "marginalised" out of the market.

In a world with price-driven demand promoting economies of scale, it looks like more and more owners are going "big", and proof of that is that the order book contains 166 dry cargo vessels larger than 200,000dwt, 74 of which are over 280,000dwt.

So will owners follow the markets and go "big", or will they look left when everyone is looking right?

Best Regards,

Theo Scholiadis - S&P Broker
http://shipping-markets.blogspot.com/

N. Cotzias Shipping

Main articles used (list not exhaustive):

- Vale Threat to Cape Owners

[Source: TradeWinds] [Date: 18/11/2010]

- Does Size Matter?

[Source: TradeWinds] [Date: 18/11/2010]

- Supertankers May Sail Empty to West Africa for Oil

[Source: Bloomberg] [Date: 18/11/2010]